http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2005/12/16/AR2005121601717.html
Bush
Picks Controversial Nominees for FEC
By Thomas B. Edsall and Dan Eggen
Washington Post Staff Writers
Saturday, December 17, 2005; Page A09
President Bush nominated two controversial lawyers to the
Federal Election Commission yesterday: Hans von Spakovsky who helped Georgia
win approval of a disputed voter-identification law, and Robert D. Lenhard, who
was part of a legal team that challenged the constitutionality of the
McCain-Feingold campaign finance law.
In addition, Bush proposed a second term for commissioner
David M. Mason and nominated Steven T. Walther, a Nevada lawyer with close ties
to Democratic Senate Minority Leader Harry M. Reid (D-Nev.).
Photos
Von Spakovsky and Mason are Republican appointees, while
Lenhard and Walther are Democratic picks for the bipartisan six-member
commission.
In a letter to Senate Rules Committee Chairman Trent Lott
(R-Miss.), Sen. Edward M. Kennedy (D-Mass.) wrote that he is "extremely
troubled" by the von Spakovsky nomination. Kennedy contends that von
Spakovsky "may be at the heart of the political interference that is
undermining the [Justice] Department's enforcement of federal civil laws."
Career Justice Department lawyers involved in a Georgia case
said von Spakovsky pushed strongly for approval of a state program requiring
voters to have photo identification. A team of staff lawyers that examined the
case recommended 4 to 1 that the Georgia plan should be rejected because it
would harm black voters; the recommendation was overruled by von Spakovsky and
other senior officials in the Civil Rights Division.
Before working in the Justice Department, von Spakovsky was
the Republican Party chairman in Fulton County, Ga., and served on the board of
the Voter Integrity Project, which advocated regular purging of voter roles to
prevent felons from casting ballots.
In a brief telephone interview, von Spakovsky played down
his role in policy decisions in the Civil Rights Division. "I'm just a
career lawyer who works in the front office of civil rights," he said. He
noted that the department has rules against career lawyers talking to
reporters.
In a 1997 policy paper, von Spakovsky wrote, "Georgia
should require all potential voters to present reliable photo identification at
their polling location to help prevent impostors from voting."
Asked if it was a conflict for von Spakovsky to work on a
case involving a Republican plan in his home state of Georgia, Justice
spokesman Eric Holland said: "Many of the dedicated and professional
attorneys in the Voting Rights Section have worked in advocacy roles involving
voting issues prior to their arrival at the Justice Department. . . . Justice
Department attorneys are always mindful of their responsibility to perform
duties in ethical matters, including recusing themselves as necessary under
standards of ethical and professional conduct."
The Lenhard nomination, first proposed in July 2003, has
provoked strong opposition from advocacy groups seeking tough enforcement of
campaign finance laws, especially the 2002 McCain-Feingold bill.
Meredith McGehee, president and executive director of the
Alliance for Better Campaigns, described the prospect of Lenhard replacing
Thomas as "beyond disappointing" when it was first proposed.
Reid issued a statement yesterday saying that he is
"very pleased the president acted today upon my two recommendations for
Commissioners on the Federal Election Commission," Walther and Lenhard.
© 2005 The Washington Post Company
FAIR USE NOTICE
This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of political, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.