http://www.usatoday.com/news/washington/2006-03-27-voting-machines_x.htm
Posted 3/27/2006
By Jim Drinkard, USA TODAY
WASHINGTON — Problems using voting machines in the Texas and
Illinois primaries this month have reinforced fears that the 2006 elections may
be beset with glitches.
"There's a lot of evidence that some of those fears are
coming to pass," says Doug Chapin, president of Electionline.org, a
non-partisan group that studies elections. "The theory that new technology
results in error seems to be borne out early in the process."
By Marcy E. Mullins, USA TODAY, Source: U.S. Election
Assistance Commission
States receiving the most federal money to upgrade voting
systems since the Help America Vote Act was passed in 2002 (in millions).
More than 30 million Americans will be voting on unfamiliar
equipment this year, after modernization required by the Help America Vote Act.
Congress passed the law in 2002 to address problems stemming from the 2000
presidential election in Florida.
Among early trouble spots:
• The largest jurisdictions in Illinois, Chicago and Cook
County, encountered problems in the March 21 primary. In some cases, precinct
election judges didn't get hands-on training before the election. There were
paper jams, misplaced memory cartridges containing election results and long
delays in counting.
Cook County Clerk David Orr says some problems were the
result of introducing two new machines in each precinct: a touch-screen ballot
and a machine that optically scans paper ballots. "We had our share of
problems, but you expect it with new stuff," Orr says.
• In Texas, a candidate for the state Supreme Court will
contest the March 7 primary because of what he calls widespread problems using
new machines.
In Fort Worth, an initial ballot count showed about 150,000
votes even though there were only one-third that many voters, says David
Rogers, campaign manager for the candidate, Steve Smith. And in San Angelo,
balky new equipment and a close local race led to a recount that was halted
after it appeared some votes were missing.
A spokesman for the secretary of state's office, Scott
Haywood, says human factors accounted for any glitches, and they have been
fixed. "Anytime you are using a new system, officials have to get used to
it," he says. "Our biggest focus now is to increase training."
The next test: 10 states hold primaries in May, including Pennsylvania,
which is scrambling to train voters and poll workers.
The state is "a disaster waiting to happen," says
John Gideon, director of VotersUnite.org, a group that is skeptical about
electronic voting.
The task is manageable, counters Michelle Shafer of Sequoia Voting Systems, an equipment maker that has customers in Pennsylvania and 19 other states. "We have seen this coming and have ramped up as best we can," and will be ready by November, she says.
|
© Copyright 2006 USA TODAY, a division of Gannett Co. Inc.