http://timesunion.com/AspStories/story.asp?storyID=444581&category=LETTER&BCCode=&newsdate=1/30/2006
Times Union
January 30, 2006
Letter to the Editor
There is a more fundamental issue with election reform than
the ineptness of state government that you decry in your Jan. 17 editorial. The
more important issue is a crisis in voter confidence in elections.
You devalue this more fundamental problem by stating that
good government groups are "bickering" over whether to choose a paper
ballot system or a DRE computer-based system. There are no good government
groups advocating for DRE systems.
The quality and quantity of the horror stories about what
happens when private corporations run elections are now staggering. A
Government Accountability Office report, released a few months ago, listed many
of these stories and concluded that computer-based voting systems are simply
not sufficiently reliable or verifiable.
It's really pretty simple. If I know my vote will be
counted, I'll accept the results -- win or lose. If I think my vote may not be
counted, either I will not accept the authority of the elected government or I
won't care. Neither of these is good for democracy.
You point out that it was only from the attention and
pressure on the Legislature that a modicum of legislative reform was passed
last year. Make no mistake, if there is no confidence in our voting system,
there will be no public pressure on elected officials, and then only lobbyists
and money will have the power to influence government.
Why would anyone ever entrust a for-profit corporation
without reliable public accountability to count our votes?
JOHN McBRIDE
Democracy for the Hudson Mohawk Region
Albany
http://timesunion.com/AspStories/story.asp?storyID=444573&category=LETTER&BCCode=&newsdate=1/30/2006
January 30, 2006
Letter to the Editor
I am writing in response to the Jan. 15 op-ed article,
"Election reform must include state's disabled." The disabilities
community and all New York state voters should be informed that there is
currently a viable system of voting that is compliant with the federal Help
America Vote Act. The system enables the disabilities community to vote in
private.
That system is the basic paper ballot. It can be accompanied
by one of a few ballot marking devices, which aid people who are visually
impaired, need to use a breath-activated device or use a language other than
English. Only one ballot marker is needed per polling place.
Paper ballots already are used for absentee voters, so they
have been in compliance with the full-face requirements of state law.
Counting the ballots can be accomplished in one of two ways.
Citizens of all viable political parties can volunteer to perform their civic
duty to count precinct votes at the time of poll closing, as is done in Canada
and other countries.
If enough people do not volunteer, a system similar to jury
duty selection could be enacted with eligible voters taking turns. If the
polling day is too long, it can be split into two segments -- poll opening to
midafternoon and midafternoon to end of vote counting (with a slight overlap
for continuity).
Alternatively, when and if it becomes available for New York
certification, a simple paper scanner can be obtained per polling place. It can
be programmed by state employees, thus ensuring program code which is open to
public scrutiny.
With the cooperation of the state Board of Elections
certifying the ballot marking devices, at least one of which is already
federally certified, and county Boards of Elections selecting one of them,
there is no need to wrestle with the problem of selecting among computers. The
high-tech machines have been plagued with errors across the country for as long
as they have been in use.
Certainly the potential for mass error or fraud is greatly
reduced with the absence of easily manipulated computer software.
Let's keep it simple, give access to the disabled and save
money and our democracy in a few easy steps.
BARBARA MURPHY
Clifton Park
The writer is a member of the New York State League of Women
Voters and New Yorkers for Verified Voting.
All Times Union materials copyright 1996-2006, Capital
Newspapers Division of The Hearst Corporation, Albany, N.Y.
FAIR USE NOTICE
This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of political, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.