http://www.newscientist.com/blog/technology/2007/04/seeing-through-walls.html

Technology

A technology blog from NewScientistBlogs

Friday, April 20, 2007

Seeing through walls

Have you considered that someone could be reading what's on your monitor from a few rooms away? It's unlikely, but possible, as work by Cambridge University computer security researcher Markus Kuhn shows.

A radio antenna and radio receiver - equipment totalling less than 1000 - is all you need. Kuhn managed to grab the image to the left through two intermediate offices and three plasterboard walls.

Back in 1985, Wim Van Eck proved it was possible to tune into the radio emissions produced by electromagentic coils in a CRT display and then reconstruct the image. The practice became known as Van Eck Phreaking, and NATO spent a fortune making its systems invulnerable to it. It was a major part of Neal Stephenson's novel Cryptonomicon.

CRTs are now well on the way to being history. But Kuhn has shown that eavesdropping is possible on flat panel displays too. It works slightly differently. With a flat panel display the aim is to tune into the radio emissions produced by the cables sending a signal to the monitor. The on-screen image is fed through the cable one pixel at a time. Because they come through in order you just have to stack them up. And Kuhn has worked out how to decode the colour of each pixel from its particular wave form.

If everything is just right, you can pick up signals from some distance. "I was able to eavesdrop certain laptops through three walls," says Kuhn. "At the CEBIT conference, in 2006, I was able to see the Powerpoint presentation from a stand 25 metres away." Here's the image he managed to get:

Kuhn also mentioned that one laptop was vulnerable because it had metal hinges that carried the signal of the display cable. I asked if you could alter a device to make it easier to spy on. "There are a lot of innocuous modifications you can make to maximise the chance of getting a good signal," he told me. For example, adding small pieces of wire or cable to a display could make a big difference.

As for defending against this kind of attack, Kuhn says using well-shielded cables, certain combinations of colours and making everything a little fuzzy all work.

For another cool security demonstration by Kuhn, check out this story on decoding the flicker a monitor casts on the walls.

Tom Simonite - online technology reporter.

Labels: , , ,

Comments:

All comments should respect the New Scientist House Rules. If you think a particular comment breaks these rules then please let us know, quoting the comment in question.

This is interesting.
I would like to know more.

Jim Somchai
http://www.visualizationmeditation.com/rights

By Anonymous on April 20, 2007 7:27 PM  

There was a british MoD program in the 80's called "Tempset" that was meant to stop the electromagnetic field of computer screens from being read at a distance. It involved lining the computer and screen casings in metal foil. You had to be authorised by the MoD before you could buy the these "Tempest" computers and screens. It also enabled secretive "Tempest Accredited" vendors to sell basic computers cocooned in tin foil for ridiculous prices.

By Daniel Jose Marie on April 20, 2007 11:35 PM  

Crazy cool, and new to me. It makes sense, but the bottom picture makes the whole thing seem shady.

I have never been to CBIT, but that bottom slide... Written by an 'executive' maybe?

And, he caught an image that managed to include the bezel? Or, he caught an image on his computer, and to show everyone, he photographed it with a digital camera?

Did the reporter loose the pic and substitute some nonsense clip art? Whats going on here?

By Martin on April 21, 2007 9:20 AM  

I suppose the bottom picture makes sense if the inexpensive equipment he is using to process the image does not include a computer.

My favorite of the proposed solutions is the last one; 'making everything a little fuzzy'. I haven't used it, but if Vista has a Gaussian blur effect for some of its UI, Maybe they should issue a security patch and apply that effect over the whole screen.

 

By Martin on April 21, 2007 10:37 AM  

There is a slight mistake in the post in that the bottom photo is just a photograph of the PowerPoint display at the nearby Russian booth that I used as an eavesdropping target at the CeBIT 2006 demo. The quality of the eavesdropped signal is of course much worse and can be seen in the top photo of this blogpost, along with the receiver and FPGA signal-processing board that I used (click on it to magnify).

If you want to read more about the subject, have a look at the introductory article Eavesdropping attacks on computer displays, the paper Electromagnetic eavesdropping risks of flat-panel displays (2004 Workshop on Privacy Enhancing Technologies), or for all the gory details my thesis Compromising emanations: eavesdropping risks of computer displays.

By Markus Kuhn on April 21, 2007 11:25 AM