Sari Joseph
April 24,
2006
Paper
Ballots and Optical Scanners are a reliable, cost-effective, easily-audited,
accessible voting technology with a long history of successful use in the
United States.
My name is
Sari Joseph, and I am a resident and voter in Manhattan. Thank you for the
opportunity to testify today. I have come here to urge you to take a clear
position on the new voting technology we have to get.
I ask you to
sponsor and work for immediate passage of Resolution 131 for paper ballots and
optical scanners with ballot-marking devices for voters with special needs, and
Resolution 228 for public testing before selection.
Paper
ballots and optical scanner technology will be used for voting this year by
1678 counties, and 69 million voters, more than any other technology.1
Optical
scanners have been in use for 20 years, and most jurisdictions that use them
are keeping them or expanding their use.
Our New York
City Board of Elections may not have looked closely at the use of optical
scanners in other places, but New Yorkers for Verified Voting, a statewide
election-integrity group, conducted a survey that gives us a realistic
appraisal of the ease of use, low costs, minimal training needed, and ease of
operation and maintenance.2
1.
Jurisdictions that use paper ballots and optical scanners are completely
satisfied with it.
2. It is
easy to use and easy to understand for voters and poll workers.
3. It is
easy to protect the security of paper ballots if you have the will to protect
them, and allow observers from every party to keep watch over the procedures on
election day and keep watch over the ballots once cast until the election is
certified.
4. Voters
with disabilities can directly mark their own paper ballot in a private and
independent way on paper ballots, by using the accessible AutoMARK
ballot-marking device which has been modified to work with a full-face paper
ballot as required by New York law.
5. Voters
with minority languages can be served by paper ballots printed in their
language, but the AutoMARK can read the ballot to a voter in any language. To
add a new language, a native speaker recites about 100 phrases into a
microphone, and the phrases are recorded digitally, and used to read the ballot
in that language.
In
conclusion, I urge each Council Member to sponsor and work for immediate
passage of Resolution 131. Thank you.
------------
1.
http://www.electiondataservices.com/EDSInc_VEStudy2006.pdf
2.
http://www.nyvv.org/reports/OptScanSurvey.pdf