http://www.rollcall.com/issues/50_50/news/7390-1.html
November 15,
2004
Democrats
Seek Recount in Hill-Sodrel Race
By Lauren W.
Whittington, Roll Call Staff
The Indiana
Democratic Party on Friday requested a recount of votes cast in the 9th district,
where Rep. Baron Hill (D-Ind.) was narrowly defeated by Republican Mike Sodrel
on Nov. 2.
The recount
request was made after an election-equipment malfunction was discovered in
Franklin County, which is not in the 9th district.
On Nov. 3,
Hill conceded defeat to Sodrel, a trucking company owner, and the most recent
vote tally available from the Indiana secretary of state's office showed Hill
trailing by 1,485 votes. As of midday Friday, Sodrel had 142,257 votes to
Hill's 140,772.
An emergency
meeting of the state's recount commission was held Friday afternoon and the
machines, ballots and all other material relating to the election were ordered
impounded. The commission will meet again on Tuesday to decide the next course
of action and to hear cross petitions from Republicans.
"They
want to hear from the other side as well," Kate Shepherd, a spokeswoman
for the Indiana secretary of state's office, said Friday.
Last week,
Rock Island, Ill.-based election equipment vendor Fidlar Election Co. acknowledged
that some of its vote-scanning machines counted straight Democratic ticket
votes as Libertarian votes.
Fidlar
provided the optical-scan Accuvote 2000 ES system to 10 Indiana counties,
including Ripley, Scott and Switzerland counties in the 9th district. But
company officials have said Franklin is the only county where that error
occurred.
"At
this point the Indiana elections division does not know of any other counties
besides Franklin that have had these difficulties," Shephard said.
But a hand
recount in Franklin late last week had already changed the outcome of at least
one local commission race, and Democrats say the 20-county recount effort is
justified.
"Obviously
Mike Sodrel won by only a very small margin," said Terry Burns, spokesman
for the Indiana Democratic Party. "To protect the integrity of this
election, we think it's just common sense to seek a recount and make sure that
everyone did have their votes counted correctly."
Sodrel, who
will be on Capitol Hill this week for freshman Member orientation, released a
statement Friday expressing confidence that his victory could withstand a
recount.
"I am
confident in the results," Sodrel said. "The people of the Ninth
District have spoken and County Clerks of both political parties across
Southeastern Indiana have confirmed the results."
Hill
defeated Sodrel in 2002 by a 9,485-vote margin, winning with just 51 percent of
the vote.
It is
unclear when a recount, if ordered, would be complete, but a Hill spokesman
reiterated the desire to have it done sooner rather than later.
"It is
in everyone's best interest, including Congressman Hill, to get this done as
quickly as possible," said Hill spokesman Stefan Bailey.
Hill, the
only Democratic incumbent outside of Texas to be defeated this year, has held
the southwestern 9th district seat since 1998. He has already sent signals that
he may seek a rematch with Sodrel in 2006.
As of
Friday, there were no House or Senate recounts under way as a result of the
Nov. 2 elections.
Copyright
2004 © Roll Call Inc. All rights reserved.
FAIR USE NOTICE
This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of political, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.