http://www.nynewsday.com/news/local/newyork/politics/nyc-vote0322,0,4598228.story?coll=nyc-manheadlines-politics
NYNewsday.com
Task force:
Replace flawed voting machines
By Dan
Janison
Staff Writer
March 21,
2005
Citing
"horrible potential scenarios," a mayoral task force Monday urged the
state to act quickly toward replacing ancient voting machines.
State
lawmakers' continuing failure to agree on key legislation could squander $220
million in federal aid, draw a federal lawsuit, or bring a "Florida-like
disaster" in 2006, with mass confusion at the polls, the task force
warned.
"As
each day passes, the risks grow exponentially," Mayor Michael Bloomberg's
Election Modernization Task Force warned in its first report.
As noted in
the 18-page report, the city's polling devices were made by Shoup Voting
Machine more than 40 years ago and are no longer made.
Replacing
them has proven to be a boondoggle -- for decades. Now the city and state face
federal deadlines to take action under the 2002 Help America Vote Act, enacted
in the wake of the 2000 presidential fiasco.
According to
the task force report, New York is the only state that has not passed the
legislation necessary to begin compliance with the act or to replace voting
machines.
"Continued
delay is unacceptable," the task force said.
Sisa Moyo,
spokeswoman for the Assembly speaker's office, said yesterday that "pieces
are coming together" toward the necessary bills.
The task
force has now joined others voicing new urgency, as did state Attorney General
Eliot Spitzer on Feb. 7. Some critics say only a potentially sloppy,
fast-tracked bid process for new machines might replace the equipment in time
for the 2006 elections.
That's the
target date for reform under the federal law.
"There
is a lot of urgency," said Gene Russianoff of the New York Public Interest
Research Group. "There's a general consensus that we need to modernize our
voting machines, though no consensus on how to do it."
Douglas
Kellner, a Democratic member of the city Board of Elections, said: "All
the checks and balances, in terms of accountability and open bidding and proper
drafting -- which are well intended and desirable for a contract this size --
would take 18 months.
"Well,
the 2006 election is less than 18 months away."
Copyright ©
2005, Newsday, Inc.
FAIR USE
NOTICE
This site
contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically
authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our
efforts to advance understanding of political, democracy, scientific, and
social justice issues. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such
copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In
accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is
distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in
receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For
more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml. If you
wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that
go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.