http://www.nytimes.com/2005/12/31/opinion/31sat3.html
December 31, 2005
Editorial
President Bush has announced four nominees for the Federal
Election Commission, moving to keep the policing of campaign abuses firmly in
the hands of party wheel horses. The timing of the announcement - the president
waited until the Senate had gone home - is likely to allow the nominees to
avoid the full hearing and confirmation process needed to evaluate them
properly.
The most objectionable nominee is Hans von Spakovsky, a
former Republican county chairman in Georgia and a political appointee at the
Justice Department. He is reported to have been involved in the maneuvering to
overrule the career specialists who warned that the Texas gerrymandering
orchestrated by Representative Tom DeLay violated minority voting rights.
Senators need the opportunity to delve into that, as well as reports of Mr. von
Spakovsky's involvement in such voting rights abuses as the purging of voter
rolls in Florida in the 2000 elections.
The need for a clean broom at the six-member election panel
becomes clearer with each new round of decisions favoring big-money politics
over the voters. But the newly nominated majority promises no improvement. In
fact, the slate would mean an end to the service of Scott Thomas, the one
incumbent praised for his independence by Senator John McCain, who has
campaigned for a clean, hack-free Federal Election Commission.
Both parties suggested candidates; the Democrats include a
union lawyer and a trusted political associate of the Senate minority leader,
Harry Reid. By endorsing them, the president has finally shown his commitment
to bipartisanship in the worst of ways: by installing another undistinguished
group of factotums to referee the democratic process.
Copyright 2005The New York Times Company
FAIR USE NOTICE
This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of political, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.