http://www.nytimes.com/2005/12/25/national/25vote.html?pagewanted=print
The New York Times
December 25, 2005
By THE ASSOCIATED PRESS
SACRAMENTO, Dec. 24 (AP) - California election officials
have told one of the country's largest makers of voting machines to repair its
software after problems with vote counts and verification surfaced in the
state's special election in November.
In a letter obtained by The Associated Press, Bradley J.
Clark, the assistant secretary of state for elections, threatened to start the process
of decertifying machines made by the maker, Election Systems and Software, if
senior officials did not address the concerns immediately.
"The California secretary of state is deeply concerned
about problems experienced by counties utilizing ES&S voting equipment and
software," Mr. Clark wrote in a letter addressed to the company president,
Aldo Tesi, nine days after the Nov. 8 election.
Software problems included incorrect counting of turnout
figures, a malfunction that prevented voters from verifying that their choices were
registered accurately and one machine recording the wrong vote in a test,
according to the letter.
Eleven California counties used the company's voting
machines in the special election. Election Systems and Software equipment also is
used in 45 other states.
The problems in California are similar to ones the company
has experienced elsewhere. In a 2004 primary election in Hawaii, glitches with
the company's optical scanners led to a miscount of about 6,000 votes.
It is the second time this week that questions have arisen
about electronic voting systems in California. The secretary of state's office
also warned 17 counties that machines made by Diebold Election Systems must
pass more rigorous security tests to be available for use in 2006. At issue
with those machines is the computer language that secures ballot entries and
instructs election officials on how to gain access to and tally the votes.
The state's letter to Election Systems and Software said it
was imperative that company representatives "take corrective action as soon
as possible."
Ken Fields, a spokesman for the company, which is based in
Omaha, said officials had since met with the secretary of state's office.
"We listened carefully to the issues that they raised,
and we've been working to address each of the issues," Mr. Fields said.
He said some of the problems outlined in the letter were
caused by operator error or misunderstandings about how the software was to be
used. None of the problems caused any incorrect votes to be recorded or
affected the election results, Mr. Fields said.
A spokeswoman for Secretary of State Bruce McPherson
declined to elaborate further on the Election Day mishaps, the problems
discussed in the letter or the company's assertion that state officials were pleased
with its proposed solutions.
Copyright
2005 The New York Times Company
FAIR USE NOTICE
This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of political, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.