http://www

http://query.nytimes.com/gst/abstract.html?res=F2081EFF3F590C768EDDA00894DB404482

Published on Thursday, September 25, 2003 by The New York Times

Report Raises Electronic Vote Security Issues

By JOHN SCHWARTZ

Electronic voting machine technology used nationwide is "at high risk of compromise" because of software flaws that could make them vulnerable to computer hackers and voting fraud, according to a review released yesterday. The report also said, though, that proper safeguards could help to mitigate the risk.

The new report, the second concerning voting machines from Diebold Election Systems, was conducted for the state of Maryland after researchers warned this summer that the Diebold AccuVote-TS voting machines, more than 33,000 of which are used in 38 states, may be vulnerable to manipulation. Maryland is adopting the machines for elections.

Diebold executives and Maryland officials said the report vindicated their view that the machines could be used reliably.

The new report, said Mark Radke, a Diebold executive, "really confirms our stance that our equipment is as secure, if not more secure, than any other electronic system in the marketplace." The company is working to improve the security even further, he added.

In a letter yesterday, James C. DiPaula, secretary of the state's Department of Management and Budget, recommended to Gov. Robert L. Ehrlich Jr. that the state advance a plan which he said "will correct specific risk factors and ensure reliability of the election process."

The earlier study, released in July, said Diebold software contained numerous security gaps that could be exploited to let people vote many times or to change votes after the fact. Aviel D. Rubin, a computer security researcher, and colleagues analyzed Diebold source codes that had been leaked to the Internet by critics of electronic voting systems.

Yesterday's report, by the Science Applications International Corporation, said that Mr. Rubin's conclusions about the company's software were "technically correct," but that the researchers "did not have a complete understanding" of Maryland's use of the system.

In an interview yesterday, Mr. Rubin said he was mystified to see that the state planned to use Diebold machines despite the report.

"It almost seems as though the people writing the Maryland action plan either did not read or did not understand the S.A.I.C. report," he said. "What they should say is, `We're going to put these systems on hold until they say that these things are safe to use.' "

James T. Smith, the Baltimore County executive, who has opposed the move to electronic voting, said the new report should stop the state from using the machines.

"For two years, Baltimore County has warned, `Iceberg ahead!' and now independent experts have warned that it's a gigantic iceberg," Mr. Smith said. "Maryland should not say, `Damn the iceberg, full speed ahead.' "

FAIR USE NOTICE

This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of political, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.