http://www.nytimes.com/2007/06/14/opinion/14thu2.html
The New York Times
June 14, 2007
Editorial
It apparently wasn’t enough for the Bush administration to
pack the Department of Justice with political operatives. The White House has
now nominated one of the most meddlesome of those partisans, Hans von
Spakovsky, to a powerful post on the Federal Election Commission.
This is the agency charged with making sure elections are
fair — an especially ludicrous perch for Mr. Spakovsky. As a voting-rights
appointee in the Justice Department, he promoted Republican initiatives to
crimp the ballot power of minorities and the poor who typically favor
Democrats.
In one of his party missions, Mr. Spakovsky overrode the
recommendations of the department’s staff professionals and approved a
regressive law in Georgia that required voters to provide photo identification.
The law, a voter suppression tool worthy of the Jim Crow era, was later blocked
by the courts. A former G.O.P. county chairman in Georgia, Mr. Spakovsky failed
to recuse himself from such an obvious conflict of interest. He also pushed for
department approval of Tom DeLay’s Texas gerrymandering plan — the plan that
the Supreme Court ruled violated the Voting Rights Act.
Feverish for the Republican edge, Mr. Spakovsky drove career
lawyers from the Justice department and constantly parroted the (Karl) Rovian
line that voter fraud is rampant, though studies have found otherwise.
Uncertain that even a Republican-controlled Senate would
approve Mr. Spakovsky’s nomination to the F.E.C., President Bush gave him a
recess appointment to the commission last year. The new Democratic-controlled
Senate now has the opportunity to strike a blow against electoral skullduggery
with a blunt rejection of Mr. Spakovsky’s nomination for a full six-year term.
The realpolitik problem with that is that the two-party
machines traditionally stack the F.E.C. with loyal mediocrities and avoid
confronting each other’s bad apples. Making it worse, Senate Majority Leader
Harry Reid has nominated a hometown buddy and party ally to the commission and
isn’t eager to jeopardize his own choice. But that’s no reason to look the
other way when it comes to Mr. Spakovsky’s obvious unfitness for the job.
Democrats should make clear to the White House — and to Mr.
Reid — that the F.E.C. is too important to be left in the hands of political
hacks or to be sacrificed for the sake of a political deal.
Copyright 2007 The New York Times Company