http://www.nytimes.com/2004/06/10/national/10elect.html
June
10, 2004
Policy on Felons and
Voting Is Still Unclear in Florida
By
Abby Goodnough
KEY
WEST, Fla., June 9 - County elections supervisors
peppered state officials on Wednesday with questions about purging felons from
their voter rolls, suggesting at a meeting here that numerous attempts to
clarify Florida's policy had not ended confusion on the issue.
At
the weeklong gathering, the supervisors have focused on how to sift through a
state-compiled list of suspected felons to determine which ones are not
eligible to vote. Florida is one of the few states where felons lose their
right to vote and must go through multiple steps to regain it after serving
their time.
The
answer to at least one crucial question remained unclear: whether elections
supervisors are obligated to find out if felons convicted in other states have
had their rights restored. One state elections official suggested they should
be, but Ed Kast, the departing chief of elections,
later told reporters that the supervisors did not need to go out of their way
to seek the information.
In
2000, the state purged an unknown number of legal voters from the rolls after
wrongly identifying them as felons. The disenfranchised included people who had
committed crimes elsewhere but had had their voting rights restored in those
other states before moving here. Many states automatically restore voting
rights after felons complete their sentences.
Howard
Simon, executive director of the American Civil Liberties Union of Florida,
told the supervisors it was illegal to deny anyone the right to vote based on
an out-of-state conviction. In a brief presentation, Mr. Simon also told the 67
supervisors that they should focus on restoring the voting rights of people who
were incorrectly purged from the rolls in 2000.
But
some supervisors said they were overwhelmed with investigating a new list of
possible felons, as the state requires, and
determining which should be disenfranchised.
Jeffrey
Long of the Florida Department of Law Enforcement said a new Web site would
help the supervisors verify convictions. County clerks are also supposed to
help with the task, but several supervisors said clerks had been unhelpful. In
a change from 2000, the supervisors have agreed to get proof of convictions,
like copies of judgments, before notifying felons that they will be purged.
"I'm
not sending any letters out until I have a piece of paper in my hand saying
that's the way it is," said Pat Hollarn, the
elections supervisor in Okaloosa County. "I'll keep checking and checking
and checking."
Copyright
2004 The New York Times Company
FAIR USE NOTICE
This site contains
copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically
authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our
efforts to advance understanding of political, democracy, scientific, and
social justice issues. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted
material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance
with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed
without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the
included information for research and educational purposes. For
more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml.
If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own
that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.