http://www.nytimes.com/2006/11/16/opinion/16thur1.html
Editorial
Counting
the Vote, Badly
Published: November 16, 2006
Last week’s elections provided a lot of disturbing news
about the reliability of electronic voting — starting, naturally, with Florida.
In a Congressional race there between Vern Buchanan, a Republican, and
Christine Jennings, a Democrat, the machines in Sarasota County reported that
more than 18,000 people, or one in eight, did not choose either candidate. That
“undervote” of nearly 13 percent is hard to believe, given that only about 2.5
percent of absentee voters did not vote in that race. If there was a glitch, it
may have made all the difference. Ms. Jennings trails Mr. Buchanan by about 400
votes.
The serious questions about the Buchanan- Jennings race only
add to the high level of mistrust that many people already feel about
electronic voting. More than half of the states, including California, New
York, Ohio and Illinois, now require that electronic voting machines produce
voter-verified paper records, which help ensure that votes are properly
recorded. But Congress has resisted all appeals to pass a law that would ensure
that electronic voting is honest and accurate across the nation.
Fortunately, that may be about to change. With the Democrats
now in control of both houses, there is an excellent chance of passing tough
electronic voting legislation. Representative Rush Holt, Democrat of New
Jersey, had more than 200 co-sponsors for a strong electronic voting bill
before this month’s election, and support is likely to grow in the new
Congress. In the Senate, Dianne Feinstein, the California Democrat who will be
chairwoman of the Rules and Administration Committee, which oversees elections,
plans to develop a similar bill.
The problems with elections go well beyond electronic
voting. Partisan secretaries of state continue to skew the rules to favor their
parties and political allies. States are adopting harsh standards for voter
registration drives to make it harder for people to register, as well as
draconian voter identification laws to make casting a ballot harder for poor
people, racial minorities, the elderly and students. Some states have adopted
an indefensible rule that provisional ballots cast at the wrong table of the
correct polling place must be thrown out.
Congress has failed to address these and other important
flaws with the mechanics of the election system. But this, too, may be about to
change. Senator Feinstein is saying that providing fair access to the ballot
will be among her committee’s top priorities in the coming year. Senator
Hillary Rodham Clinton, Democrat of New York, plans to revise and reintroduce
her “Count Every Vote Act,” which takes an admirably broad approach to
overhauling the voting system.
Election reform has tended to be a partisan issue, with
Democrats arguing for reform and Republicans resisting it. It shouldn’t be.
Congressional Democrats should make fixing this country’s broken system of
elections a top priority, and Republicans should join them.
Copyright 2006 The New York Times Company