http://www.nytimes.com/2006/05/17/nyregion/17vote.html?_r=1&oref=slogin
The New York Times Company
By MICHAEL COOPER
Published: May 17, 2006
ALBANY, May 16 — New York City would provide voting machines
that are accessible to the disabled at five locations in the city this fall as
part of the state's plan for settling a federal lawsuit for failing to
modernize its voting system.
The proposal falls far short of a goal of the federal Help
America Vote Act — to have a voting system accessible to the disabled at each
polling place in the state — but city and state officials say it is the best
they can do with fall elections approaching.
The state was sued in March by the Department of Justice,
which said that New York had fallen behind the rest of the nation in putting
the Help America Vote Act into effect. The measure called on the states to
overhaul their election systems.
But with the September primaries approaching fast, city and
state officials said that there was not enough time to replace all the voting
machines in the state without causing chaos in the elections. So late last
month the state offered — and the Justice Department reluctantly agreed to
support — a vastly scaled-back stopgap measure.
That measure allows the state and its counties to determine
how many handicapped-accessible voting systems to put in place. Most counties
asked to have only one machine put in place. New York City is planning to have
accessible machines put at one site in each borough. The proposal is now being
considered by a federal judge here.
State Senator John J. Flanagan, a Long Island Republican,
said on Tuesday that the interim plan provided too few accessible polling
places, and questioned why voters who use wheelchairs should have to travel
long distances to use accessible machines. He proposed that the state quickly
provide $10 million to counties so they can buy more accessible machines.
But the counties say that it is not just the money, but the
lack of time that they have to buy new machines, test them and train workers in
their use. And they note that delays at the state level were mainly responsible
for their predicament.
John Ravitz, the executive director of the city's Board of
Elections, said the city would do the best it could in the short amount of time
it had. "This whole interim response is part of a dysfunctional process
that has been laid at our doorstep," he said.
At the Board of Elections office in each of the five
boroughs, the city will have two to five ballot-marking devices, and experts
will be standing by to deal with any problems that arise, he said. Disabled
voters will continue to have the option of voting with absentee ballots, or
with assistance at polling places.
The handicapped-accessible machines would allow voters to
bypass traditional lever machines. The ballot-marking devices could include
machines that use audio, for blind voters, or machines that use a technology
that allows quadriplegic voters to sip and puff into a machine that can read
such signals to mark ballots.
The Justice Department said in court papers that it
reluctantly supported the interim plan — but added that the state could still
be liable to lose some or all of the $221 million of federal money it has
received to overhaul its election system.
Copyright 2006 The New York Times Company