Statement of Teresa Hommel
July 13, 2004
Rally for Verified Voting in Albany, NY
The price of liberty is
eternal vigilance.
But now, it seems that too
many of us have not been vigilant for too long.
Now we learn that an estimated
30% of American voters will vote in November, 2004, on electronic voting
equipment that cannot be audited for accuracy.
"Trust us," the vendors say.
That's inappropriate in a
democracy.
The Russian dictator Josef
Stalin said, "It's not who votes that counts, it's who counts the
votes!"
Anastasio Samoza, the brutal dictator
who ruled Nicaragua from 1967 to 1979, is reputed to have said, "You won
the vote, but I won the count."
Where is the outrage about
these voting systems that record the ballots in secret, and count the votes in
secret?
Where is the outrage when
some salesman tells us to trust his computer that can't be audited, that
hides fraud, and by doing so surely invites it?
Where is the outrage?
It's here, in my heart, and in
my words, and in all of us, that's why we're here in the rain, to bear witness
to this problem, and to challenge our legislature, and governor, and state
Board of Elections to solve it.
It is an outrage for people
to try to make money by selling us voting equipment that destroys democracy --
destroys democracy by forcing us to
vote on equipment that prevents human oversight of the
election process, that conducts our elections with secret software, that
prevents recounts.
It is an outrage, for people
to design and build and sell equipment that effectively destroys democracy.
Don't say that it's corrupt
corporations! It is people, American citizens, who work for those corporations,
who own and manage those corporations, who want to make money by selling out
our democracy.
"But we do trust the computer!"
Now, who's saying that? Some Boards of Election around our country,
some Secretaries of State. And vendors.
Shame! Shame! An outrage and
a shame!
We're lucky, because here in
New York state, we have two good bills, one in the Assembly and one in our
Senate, that mandate a voter-verified paper audit trail.
That's good!
That's good because it
enables us to perform an audit and verify that the computers are recording the
ballots and counting the votes accurately.
But creating the
Voter-verified paper ballots is not enough!
The whole point of creating them, is to use them to
perform an audit. Well, you have to do an audit!
You can run the voter-verified
paper ballots through an optical scanner. You can count them by hand! But if there's no end-of-day reconciliation,
or audit, then we're back where we started. We don't know if the election
tallies reflect the will of the voters, or if they were created by the
computer.
I don't care if the computer
is wrong because of an innocent mistake or a malicious mistake. I don't care if
the computer is wrong because of an insider or an outside hacker. It doesn't
matter, democracy is lost.
People say the computer will
give us accessibility and speed and accuracy. I say, without an audit, we'll
have accessibility and speed and inaccuracy.
The accuracy only comes from
doing the audit, and if we can't audit, then we shouldn't be using a computer
to record and count votes. It's a wrong use of the technology. If you
can't do an audit, then just use the computer as a ballot marking device to
provide accessibility for voters who need it, and let people or scanners count
the votes.
We have given elections a low
personal, cultural and fiscal priority, for too long.
It is time for a good old
dose of American ingenuity, American can-do, American know-how.
I believe that if we want to solve this problem we can. So, let's challenge
everyone who says they love this country. Let's challenge them to work together
with us.
Let's solve this problem, and
all the other problems that have weakened our elections, and our democracy.
The responsibility of
citizens in a democracy is to maintain an active relationship with our
government, and to participate in our own self-governing.
In 1927, Supreme Court
Justice Louis Brandeis said: "Those
who won our independence … believed … that the greatest menace to freedom is an
inert people; that public discussion is a political duty...."
So let's discuss the problems
we have with elections, and come up with ways to solve them.
We the People, this is our
country, it's up to us.
# # #