http://www.starbulletin.com/editorials/20090917_fix_elections_office.html
www.starbulletin.com > Editorials >
EDITORIAL
POSTED: 01:30 a.m. HST, Sep 17, 2009
Hawaii's next statewide elections are a year away, but
serious questions have arisen about whether the agency assigned to facilitate
the vote is up to the task. The state Elections Commission must determine if
new leadership is needed to assure a smooth process that meets legal
requirements.
In a Senate Ways and Means Committee hearing this week,
Chairwoman Donna Mercado Kim asserted that Kevin Cronin, the chief elections
officer, "has not performed his duties the way it should be." The
Elections Commission has the authority to replace Cronin, and Kim said it
"needs to review his actions all around."
Cronin had a rocky beginning to the job last year in a
dispute with a company over a contract for voting machines and chaotic
administration of candidate filings.
To top it off, he failed to register to vote here until July
25, 2008, even though he began work five months earlier upon his move from
Wisconsin. The elections officer is required by law to be a registered voter.
The office's present problems include state budget
reductions leaving it $113,000 short of what is needed to run the office.
Cronin reported in July that operational funds had been reduced to less than
$15,000, barely enough to pay for electricity, water and other building
maintenance for two months.
Kim suggested the money problem was at least partially
caused by Cronin's decision to give pay raises to the office's employees with
funds that had been set aside for converting jobs to civil service positions.
He also bought expensive electronic voting machines that a
state judge on Maui ruled on Monday could not be used because proposed
electronic voting methods had not undergone public hearings.
Cronin, a lawyer, declined to answer questions about the
Maui court ruling because the case still is pending. He said his knowledge of
budget issues is limited because he has relied on the state Department of
Accounting and General Services to handle such matters.
Operation of the elections office may be difficult to adjust
to budget cuts and still meet legal standards, but questions raised by Cronin's
spending decisions warrant the swift scrutiny of the Elections Commission.
In the meantime, the Legislature should consider following
Oregon's lead in adopting a system of mailing ballots to all eligible voters,
giving them two to three weeks to fill out and return them by mail or at
centralized drop-off locations. The system was used successfully in April to
conduct a special election to replace the late Barbara Marshall on the City
Council, then again last month for the late Duke Bainum's vacancy.
In last year's election, Hawaii had the nation's lowest
voter turnout, even with Hawaii-born Barack Obama on the ballot. Oregon's
method significantly raised that state's voter participation while reducing election
expenditures.
Hawaii's next statewide elections are a year away, but
serious questions have arisen about whether the agency assigned to facilitate
the vote is up to the task. The state Elections Commission must determine if
new leadership is needed to assure a smooth process that meets legal
requirements.
Click Here For More Info!
In a Senate Ways and Means Committee hearing this week,
Chairwoman Donna Mercado Kim asserted that Kevin Cronin, the chief elections
officer, "has not performed his duties the way it should be." The
Elections Commission has the authority to replace Cronin, and Kim said it
"needs to review his actions all around."
Cronin had a rocky beginning to the job last year in a
dispute with a company over a contract for voting machines and chaotic administration
of candidate filings.
To top it off, he failed to register to vote here until July
25, 2008, even though he began work five months earlier upon his move from
Wisconsin. The elections officer is required by law to be a registered voter.
The office's present problems include state budget
reductions leaving it $113,000 short of what is needed to run the office.
Cronin reported in July that operational funds had been reduced to less than
$15,000, barely enough to pay for electricity, water and other building
maintenance for two months.
Kim suggested the money problem was at least partially
caused by Cronin's decision to give pay raises to the office's employees with
funds that had been set aside for converting jobs to civil service positions.
He also bought expensive electronic voting machines that a
state judge on Maui ruled on Monday could not be used because proposed
electronic voting methods had not undergone public hearings.
Cronin, a lawyer, declined to answer questions about the
Maui court ruling because the case still is pending. He said his knowledge of
budget issues is limited because he has relied on the state Department of
Accounting and General Services to handle such matters.
Operation of the elections office may be difficult to adjust
to budget cuts and still meet legal standards, but questions raised by Cronin's
spending decisions warrant the swift scrutiny of the Elections Commission.
In the meantime, the Legislature should consider following
Oregon's lead in adopting a system of mailing ballots to all eligible voters,
giving them two to three weeks to fill out and return them by mail or at
centralized drop-off locations. The system was used successfully in April to
conduct a special election to replace the late Barbara Marshall on the City
Council, then again last month for the late Duke Bainum's vacancy.
In last year's election, Hawaii had the nation's lowest voter turnout, even with Hawaii-born Barack Obama on the ballot. Oregon's method significantly raised that state's voter participation while reducing election expenditures.