FROM:
Teresa
Hommel
Chair, Task
Force on Election Integrity, Community Church of New York
TO:
New York
State Board of Elections
40 Steuben
Street
Albany, NY
12207-2108
Comment on
Draft Voting Systems Standards
Section
6209.7 Modifications and Re-examination
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SBOE DRAFT
C.
Prospective modification shall be reviewed by the State Board or by an examiner
or
laboratory
of the Board's choice in accordance with the fee schedule established by
section
7-201 of the
Election Law.
D. Upon
completion of a review of such prospective modification, the State Board may
cause a
re-examination of the entire voting system, or within its discretion, grant
continuation
of certification pursuant to the provisions of section 7-201 of the Election
Law.
HOMMEL
SUGGESTED REPLACEMENT
C. The
Vendor shall make the prospective modification upon the Escrow System, and the
State Board shall cause the Escrow System to go through the certification
process, including all tests performed for its original certification.
D. Upon
successful completion of all tests for re-certification, the modification may
be made upon voting systems of the same type in possession of County Boards.
E. In each
county where the modification has been made on voting systems, within five
business days after completion of modifications, ten percent of such modified
voting systems shall be chosen by random selection process and these selected
voting systems shall be compared to the Escrow System of their type.
1. If any county has fewer than ten
voting systems of the modified type, one system shall be chosen by random
selection process from those modified.
2. The County Board shall post
public notice at the office of the County Board for a minimum of five days
prior to the random selection process. The County Board shall provide notice of
the random selection process a minimum of four days in advance by mail, telephone,
and email to the heads of all recognized political parties in the county.
3. The random selection process
shall be conducted in public before any member of the public who may wish to
attend and observe.
4. The State Board shall compare the
selected voting systems to the Escrow System of their type with regard to all
components on the Escrow Component List to determine that the modified voting
systems are identical to the Escrow System of their type.
5. If any selected voting system is
not identical to the Escrow System of its type, the State Board shall
immediately rescind the certification of that voting system.